H.C. STARCK SOLUTIONS COLDWATER LLC
Quick Summary
- •Released 20,120 lbs of toxic chemicals to the environment in the most recent TRI reporting year.
- •Currently out of compliance in at least one environmental program (CAA, CWA, or RCRA).
- •Assessed $68,235 in total penalties since records began.
- •Reports releases of chemicals classified as known or probable carcinogens.
- Address
-
460 JAY ST.
COLDWATER, MI 49036
View on map ↗ - County
- BRANCH County
- Industry
- Manufacturing
- NAICS (North American Industry Classification)
- 332117
- Inspections
- 5 · last Jun 18, 2025
- Total Penalties
- $68,235 · last May 5, 2023
- Registry ID
- 110000409095
How This Compares
Ranked by most recent year's total TRI releases.
Compliance Status (Last 12 Quarters)
Number of calendar quarters, out of the last 12, in which this facility was in violation of its permit. Zero means no recorded violations in that program over the past three years.
Qtrs Non-Compliant
Qtrs Non-Compliant
Qtrs Non-Compliant
TRI Toxic Chemical Releases
Annual pounds of each toxic chemical released to air, water, and land, as reported to the EPA Toxic Release Inventory. Carcinogen (♦) and PFAS designations are per EPA and IARC classifications.
| Year | Total Releases (lbs) | vs Prior Year |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 19,906 | — |
| 2016 | 13,224 | -34% |
| 2017 | 20,120 | +52% |
| 2018 | 18,110 | -10% |
| 2019 | 17,198 | -5% |
| 2020 | 9,125 | -47% |
| 2021 | 9,165 | 0% |
| 2022 | 9,064 | -1% |
| 2023 | 8,260 | -9% |
| 2024 | 7,054 | -15% |
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
| Chemical | Total (lbs) | Air | Water | Land | Off-Site | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammonia | 17,198 | 17,198 | — | — | — |
2018
2017
2016
Waste Management & Recycling
How this facility manages toxic chemicals beyond direct releases — through recycling, energy recovery, and on-site or off-site treatment. Data from the most recent TRI reporting year. Quantities in pounds.
| Chemical | Released | Recycled | Energy Recovery | Treated |
|---|
Off-Site Transfer Destinations
Facilities to which toxic chemicals were transferred for disposal, recycling, energy recovery, or treatment during the most recent TRI reporting year. Quantities in pounds.
| Destination | Chemical | Disposal | Recycling | Energy Rec. | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LIQUID INDUSTRIAL WASTE
HOLLAND, MI
|
Ammonia | — | — | — | 5 |
Transfers to Publicly-Owned Treatment Works (POTWs)
Toxic chemicals transferred to municipal wastewater treatment plants during the most recent TRI reporting year. Quantities in pounds.
Compliance Violations
Individual permit violations recorded by the EPA across air, water, and hazardous waste programs. Open violations are unresolved as of the most recent ECHO data update.
| Program | Type | Violation Date | Return to Compliance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cwa | Management Practice Violations - Improper Operation and Maintenance | Aug 29, 2023 | — | Open |
| cwa | Monitoring Violations - Improper Analysis or Lab Error | Aug 18, 2023 | — | Open |
| cwa | Monitoring Violations - Invalid/Unrepresentative Sample | Aug 18, 2023 | — | Open |
| caa | FRV | Sep 7, 2021 | — | Open |
| cwa | Reporting Violations - Late Submittal of DMRs | Aug 21, 2021 | — | Open |
| cwa | Other noncompliance related to industrial stormwater discharges | Mar 26, 2020 | — | Open |
| cwa | Management Practice Violations - Failure to Maintain Records | Mar 26, 2020 | — | Open |
| cwa | Management Practice Violations - Best Management Practice Deficiencies | Mar 26, 2020 | — | Open |
| cwa | Failure to eliminate or relocate industrial stormwater outfalls from identified sensitive areas | Mar 26, 2020 | — | Open |
| cwa | Monitoring Violations - Improper Analysis or Lab Error | Nov 23, 2016 | — | Open |
| cwa | Monitoring Violations - Invalid/Unrepresentative Sample | Nov 23, 2016 | — | Open |
| caa | FRV | Sep 23, 2016 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved and not reported | Jan 10, 2015 | Nov 10, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event reported late | Jan 10, 2015 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Jan 10, 2015 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved but reported | Jan 10, 2015 | Nov 10, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Jan 10, 2015 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event reported late | Jan 10, 2015 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event reported late | Jan 10, 2015 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Jan 10, 2015 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event reported late | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved and not reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event reported late | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved and not reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event reported late | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved and not reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event reported late | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved and not reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event reported late | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved and not reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event reported late | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved and not reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Jan 29, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event reported late | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Nov 10, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved and not reported | Jan 10, 2014 | Nov 10, 2015 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event reported late | Jan 10, 2014 | — | Open |
Discharge Limit Exceedances
Instances where this facility's reported discharge monitoring results exceeded its permitted limits under the Clean Water Act. Exceedance percentage shows how far over the permit limit the discharge was.
| Pollutant | Violation | Reported | Limit | Exceedance | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.08 mg/L | 0.03 | +159% | Apr 2022 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.33 mg/L | 0.10 | +244% | Apr 2022 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.03 mg/L | 0.03 | +5% | Mar 2022 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.17 mg/L | 0.10 | +73% | Sep 2021 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.06 mg/L | 0.03 | +103% | Sep 2021 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.13 mg/L | 0.10 | +30% | May 2021 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.05 mg/L | 0.03 | +76% | May 2021 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.04 mg/L | 0.03 | +28% | Apr 2021 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.11 mg/L | 0.10 | +11% | Apr 2021 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.05 mg/L | 0.03 | +57% | Mar 2021 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.14 mg/L | 0.10 | +40% | Mar 2021 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.24 mg/L | 0.10 | +152% | Aug 2020 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.11 mg/L | 0.03 | +276% | Aug 2020 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.08 mg/L | 0.03 | +178% | Jul 2020 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.14 mg/L | 0.10 | +41% | Jul 2020 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.11 mg/L | 0.10 | +15% | Jun 2020 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.07 mg/L | 0.03 | +125% | Jun 2020 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.05 mg/L | 0.03 | +64% | May 2020 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.11 mg/L | 0.03 | +272% | Oct 2019 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.25 kg/d | 0.15 | +69% | Oct 2019 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.29 mg/L | 0.10 | +198% | Oct 2019 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.06 kg/d | 0.05 | +33% | Oct 2019 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.18 mg/L | 0.10 | +80% | Sep 2019 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.09 mg/L | 0.03 | +198% | Sep 2019 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.16 kg/d | 0.15 | +7% | Sep 2019 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.05 kg/d | 0.05 | +5% | Sep 2019 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.75 mg/L | 0.10 | +677% | Aug 2019 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.20 mg/L | 0.03 | +555% | Aug 2019 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.03 mg/L | 0.03 | +11% | May 2019 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.06 mg/L | 0.03 | +104% | Nov 2018 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.18 mg/L | 0.10 | +86% | Nov 2018 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.04 mg/L | 0.03 | +25% | Apr 2018 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.14 mg/L | 0.10 | +45% | Aug 2017 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.05 mg/L | 0.03 | +79% | Aug 2017 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.03 mg/L | 0.03 | +8% | Mar 2017 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.16 mg/L | 0.10 | +69% | Feb 2017 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.05 mg/L | 0.03 | +83% | Feb 2017 | Open |
Enforcement Actions
Formal enforcement cases brought by the EPA or state agencies, including administrative orders and civil penalties assessed. Penalty amounts reflect what was formally assessed, not necessarily what was collected.