TAMU MAIN CAMPUS WWTP
Quick Summary
- •Currently out of compliance in at least one environmental program (CAA, CWA, or RCRA).
- •Assessed $0 in total penalties since records began.
- Address
-
9685 WHITES CREEK RD
COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845
View on map ↗ - County
- BRAZOS County
- Inspections
- 2 · last Jan 7, 2025
- Total Penalties
- $0
- Registry ID
- 110034902461
Compliance Status (Last 12 Quarters)
Number of calendar quarters, out of the last 12, in which this facility was in violation of its permit. Zero means no recorded violations in that program over the past three years.
Qtrs Non-Compliant
Compliance Violations
Individual permit violations recorded by the EPA across air, water, and hazardous waste programs. Open violations are unresolved as of the most recent ECHO data update.
| Program | Type | Violation Date | Return to Compliance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cwa | Permit Violations - Violation Specified in Comment | Jan 7, 2025 | Jan 16, 2025 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Oct 13, 2023 | — | Open |
| cwa | Permit Violations - Violation Specified in Comment | Jan 24, 2023 | Feb 15, 2023 | Resolved |
| cwa | Permit Violations - Violation Specified in Comment | Dec 13, 2018 | — | Open |
| cwa | Permit Violations - Violation Specified in Comment | Apr 25, 2017 | — | Open |
| cwa | Permit Violations - Violation Specified in Comment | May 31, 2016 | — | Open |
| cwa | Permit Violations - Violation Specified in Comment | Sep 24, 2015 | — | Open |
| cwa | Permit Violations - Violation Specified in Comment | Jan 8, 2014 | — | Open |
Discharge Limit Exceedances
Instances where this facility's reported discharge monitoring results exceeded its permitted limits under the Clean Water Act. Exceedance percentage shows how far over the permit limit the discharge was.
| Pollutant | Violation | Reported | Limit | Exceedance | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 435.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +9% | Mar 2022 | Open |
| Flow, in conduit or thru treatment plant | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 9.29 MGD | 9.00 | +3% | Jun 2021 | Open |
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 60.50 mg/L | 45.00 | +34% | Apr 2021 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 2,420.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +507% | Jul 2020 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 2,420.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +507% | Jun 2020 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 961.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +141% | Apr 2020 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 722.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +81% | Feb 2020 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 1,011.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +153% | Jan 2020 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 961.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +141% | Oct 2019 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 2,420.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +507% | Aug 2019 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 1,986.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +398% | Jun 2019 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 551.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +38% | Jan 2019 | Open |
| Flow, in conduit or thru treatment plant | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 9.40 MGD | 9.00 | +4% | Dec 2018 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 2,420.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +507% | Oct 2018 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 2,420.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +507% | Sep 2018 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 479.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +20% | May 2018 | Open |
| Flow, in conduit or thru treatment plant | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 10.80 MGD | 9.00 | +20% | Mar 2018 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 1,203.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +202% | Nov 2017 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 2,420.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +507% | Oct 2017 | Open |
| Flow, in conduit or thru treatment plant | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 9.30 MGD | 9.00 | +3% | Oct 2017 | Open |
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 56.70 mg/L | 45.00 | +26% | Oct 2017 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 2,420.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +507% | Sep 2017 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 2,420.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +507% | Aug 2017 | Open |
| Flow, in conduit or thru treatment plant | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 11.99 MGD | 9.00 | +33% | Aug 2017 | Open |
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 53.10 mg/L | 45.00 | +18% | Aug 2017 | Open |
| Molybdenum, sludge, total, dry weight [as Mo] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 114.50 mg/L | 75.00 | +53% | Jul 2017 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 1,860.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +366% | Jun 2017 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 691.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +73% | Apr 2017 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 1,553.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +289% | Mar 2017 | Open |
| Flow, in conduit or thru treatment plant | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 11.99 MGD | 9.00 | +33% | Feb 2017 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 792.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +98% | Feb 2017 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 2,420.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +507% | Jan 2017 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 542.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +36% | Nov 2016 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 805.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +102% | Dec 2015 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 411.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +3% | Jun 2015 | Open |
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 422.76 kg/d | 302.82 | +40% | Jan 2015 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 1,935.00 MPN/100mL | 399.00 | +385% | Jan 2015 | Open |
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 345.00 mg/L | 45.00 | +667% | Jan 2015 | Open |
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 43.00 mg/L | 20.00 | +115% | Jan 2015 | Open |
Enforcement Actions
Formal enforcement cases brought by the EPA or state agencies, including administrative orders and civil penalties assessed. Penalty amounts reflect what was formally assessed, not necessarily what was collected.