NPK ACCESS SOLUTIONS LLC
Quick Summary
- •Currently out of compliance in at least one environmental program (CAA, CWA, or RCRA).
- •Assessed $1,000 in total penalties since records began.
- Address
-
2900 HWY 93
CARENCRO, LA 70520
View on map ↗ - County
- LAFAYETTE County
- Industry
- Manufacturing
- NAICS (North American Industry Classification)
- 326199
- Inspections
- 1 · last Feb 5, 2025
- Total Penalties
- $1,000 · last Feb 14, 2023
- Registry ID
- 110006030482
Compliance Status (Last 12 Quarters)
Number of calendar quarters, out of the last 12, in which this facility was in violation of its permit. Zero means no recorded violations in that program over the past three years.
Qtrs Non-Compliant
Qtrs Non-Compliant
Compliance Violations
Individual permit violations recorded by the EPA across air, water, and hazardous waste programs. Open violations are unresolved as of the most recent ECHO data update.
| Program | Type | Violation Date | Return to Compliance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cwa | Effluent Violations - Numeric effluent violation | Sep 30, 2015 | Jan 30, 2018 | Resolved |
| cwa | WW Storm Water Non-Construction - Failure to develop any or adequate SWPPP/SWMP | Jul 23, 2015 | Jan 30, 2018 | Resolved |
| cwa | Management Practice Violations - Failure to Develop Adequate SPCC Plan | Jul 23, 2015 | Jan 30, 2018 | Resolved |
| cwa | Reporting Violations - Failure to Submit DMRs | Jun 30, 2013 | Jan 30, 2018 | Resolved |
| cwa | Reporting Violations - Failure to Submit DMRs | Apr 30, 2013 | Jan 30, 2018 | Resolved |
| cwa | Effluent Violations - Numeric effluent violation | Jun 30, 2011 | Jan 30, 2018 | Resolved |
Discharge Limit Exceedances
Instances where this facility's reported discharge monitoring results exceeded its permitted limits under the Clean Water Act. Exceedance percentage shows how far over the permit limit the discharge was.
| Pollutant | Violation | Reported | Limit | Exceedance | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 69.70 mg/L | 30.00 | +132% | Oct 2024 | Open |
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 69.70 mg/L | 45.00 | +55% | Oct 2024 | Open |
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 31.00 mg/L | 30.00 | +3% | Jul 2024 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.12 mg/L | 0.10 | +17% | Jun 2021 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.11 mg/L | 0.10 | +11% | Mar 2021 | Open |
| Coliform, fecal general | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 866.00 MPN/100mL | 400.00 | +117% | Jun 2020 | Open |
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 65.30 mg/L | 45.00 | +45% | Dec 2019 | Open |
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 65.30 mg/L | 30.00 | +118% | Dec 2019 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.12 mg/L | 0.10 | +20% | Jan 2019 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.18 mg/L | 0.10 | +80% | Dec 2018 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.11 mg/L | 0.06 | +85% | Oct 2017 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.21 mg/L | 0.14 | +48% | Oct 2017 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.08 mg/L | 0.06 | +33% | Dec 2016 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.20 mg/L | 0.06 | +236% | Nov 2016 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.27 mg/L | 0.14 | +93% | Nov 2016 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.15 mg/L | 0.14 | +4% | Aug 2016 | Open |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.09 mg/L | 0.06 | +47% | Aug 2016 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.12 mg/L | 0.06 | +103% | Apr 2016 | Resolved |
| Copper, total [as Cu] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.16 mg/L | 0.14 | +13% | Apr 2016 | Open |
Enforcement Actions
Formal enforcement cases brought by the EPA or state agencies, including administrative orders and civil penalties assessed. Penalty amounts reflect what was formally assessed, not necessarily what was collected.