STANLEY L. GOODWIN WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Quick Summary
- •Currently out of compliance in at least one environmental program (CAA, CWA, or RCRA).
- •Assessed $0 in total penalties since records began.
- Address
-
2545 CHARLESTON HWY
WEST COLUMBIA, SC 29172
View on map ↗ - County
- LEXINGTON County
- Industry
- Utilities
- NAICS (North American Industry Classification)
- 221320
- Inspections
- 5 · last Apr 16, 2025
- Total Penalties
- $0 · last Jan 5, 2005
- Registry ID
- 110000557905
Compliance Status (Last 12 Quarters)
Number of calendar quarters, out of the last 12, in which this facility was in violation of its permit. Zero means no recorded violations in that program over the past three years.
Qtrs Non-Compliant
Compliance Violations
Individual permit violations recorded by the EPA across air, water, and hazardous waste programs. Open violations are unresolved as of the most recent ECHO data update.
| Program | Type | Violation Date | Return to Compliance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cwa | Reporting Violations - Improper/ Incorrect Reporting | Oct 19, 2023 | — | Open |
| cwa | Pretreatment - Failure to submit required report (non-DMR) | Feb 18, 2021 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved and not reported | Jun 1, 2005 | Jul 20, 2005 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | Jun 1, 2005 | — | Open |
| cwa | Schedule Event unachieved and not reported | May 1, 2005 | Jul 20, 2005 | Resolved |
| cwa | Schedule Event achieved late but reported | May 1, 2005 | — | Open |
Discharge Limit Exceedances
Instances where this facility's reported discharge monitoring results exceeded its permitted limits under the Clean Water Act. Exceedance percentage shows how far over the permit limit the discharge was.
| Pollutant | Violation | Reported | Limit | Exceedance | Period | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 6,293.35 kg/d | 4,264.42 | +48% | May 2025 | Open |
| Solids, total suspended | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 56.00 mg/L | 45.00 | +24% | May 2025 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 687.00 MPN/100mL | 349.00 | +97% | May 2025 | Open |
| %Effect Static Renewal 7 Day Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 79.00 % | 40.00 | +98% | Feb 2025 | Open |
| %Effect Static Renewal 7 Day Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 58.00 % | 25.00 | +132% | Feb 2025 | Open |
| Chlorine, total residual | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 0.24 mg/L | 0.17 | +41% | Nov 2022 | Open |
| Phosphorus, total [as P] | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 2.50 mg/L | 2.00 | +25% | Jun 2022 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 1,553.00 MPN/100mL | 349.00 | +345% | May 2021 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 1,553.00 MPN/100mL | 800.00 | +94% | May 2021 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 1,733.00 MPN/100mL | 349.00 | +397% | Apr 2021 | Open |
| E. coli | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 1,733.00 MPN/100mL | 800.00 | +117% | Apr 2021 | Open |
| %Effect Static Renewal 7 Day Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 37.20 % | 25.00 | +49% | Feb 2021 | Open |
| %Effect Static Renewal 7 Day Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 82.00 % | 40.00 | +105% | Feb 2021 | Open |
| %Effect Static Renewal 7 Day Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 41.00 % | 25.00 | +64% | Aug 2019 | Open |
| %Effect Static Renewal 7 Day Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 67.00 % | 40.00 | +68% | Aug 2019 | Open |
| Coliform, fecal general | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 649.00 MPN/100mL | 400.00 | +62% | Dec 2015 | Open |
| Coliform, fecal general | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 13.00 MPN/100mL | 200.00 | +99,999% | Sep 2015 | Open |
| Coliform, fecal general | DMR, Limited - Numeric Violation | 2,420.00 MPN/100mL | 400.00 | +99,999% | Sep 2015 | Open |
Enforcement Actions
Formal enforcement cases brought by the EPA or state agencies, including administrative orders and civil penalties assessed. Penalty amounts reflect what was formally assessed, not necessarily what was collected.